| Stream restoration strategies for reducing river nitrogen loads LS Craig, MA Palmer, DC Richardson, S Filoso, ES Bernhardt, ... Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6 (10), 529-538, 2008 | 370 | 2008 |
| Restoring watersheds project by project: trends in Chesapeake Bay tributary restoration B Hassett, M Palmer, E Bernhardt, S Smith, J Carr, D Hart Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3 (5), 259-267, 2005 | 145 | 2005 |
| A summary report of sediment processes in Chesapeake Bay and watershed - Ch. 3: Watershed sediment sources S Smith, M Langland, R Edwards Water-Resources Investigations Report 4123 (4123), 34-40, 2003 | 139* | 2003 |
| Urbanization changes the composition and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter in headwater streams TB Parr, CS Cronan, T Ohno, SEG Findlay, S Smith, KS Simon Limnology and Oceanography 60 (3), 885-900, 2015 | 123 | 2015 |
| Hydraulic performance of a morphology‐based stream channel design SM Smith, KL Prestegaard Water Resources Research 41 (11), 2005 | 116 | 2005 |
| A multiscale approach to balance trade-offs among dam infrastructure, river restoration, and cost SG Roy, E Uchida, SP de Souza, B Blachly, E Fox, K Gardner, AJ Gold, ... Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (47), 12069-12074, 2018 | 83 | 2018 |
| Closing the gap between watershed modeling, sediment budgeting, and stream restoration S Smith, P Belmont, PR Wilcock Geophysical Monograph Series 194, 293, 2011 | 69 | 2011 |
| Upland sediment supply and its relation to watershed sediment delivery in the contemporary mid-Atlantic Piedmont (USA) SMC Smith, PR Wilcock Geomorphology 232, 33-46, 2015 | 55 | 2015 |
| A fault runs through it: Modeling the influence of rock strength and grain‐size distribution in a fault‐damaged landscape SG Roy, GE Tucker, PO Koons, SM Smith, P Upton Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 121 (10), 1911-1930, 2016 | 46 | 2016 |
| Automated riverbed sediment classification using low-cost sidescan sonar D Buscombe, PE Grams, SMC Smith Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 142 (2), 06015019, 2016 | 45 | 2016 |
| The Chesapeake Bay program modeling system: Overview and recommendations for future development RR Hood, GW Shenk, RL Dixon, SMC Smith, WP Ball, JO Bash, R Batiuk, ... Ecological Modelling 456, 109635, 2021 | 44 | 2021 |
| The efficacy of constructed stream–wetland complexes at reducing the flux of suspended solids to Chesapeake Bay S Filoso, SMC Smith, MR Williams, MA Palmer Environmental science & technology 49 (15), 8986-8994, 2015 | 36 | 2015 |
| Legacy Sediment, Riparian Corridors, and Total Maximum Daily Loads A Miller, M Baker, K Boomer, D Merritts, K Prestegaard, S Smith Chesapeake Bay Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) Publication, 2019 | 18 | 2019 |
| Reservations about dam findings DJ Bain, SMC Smith, GN Nagle Science 321 (5891), 910-910, 2008 | 17 | 2008 |
| Status and trends of river and stream restoration in the Chesapeake Bay watershed B Hassett, MA Palmer, ES Bernhardt, S Smith, J Carr, D Hart Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3, 259-267, 2005 | 14 | 2005 |
| Changes in the hydraulic and morphological characteristics of a relocated stream channel SM Smith Department of Geology, University of Maryland, 1997 | 10 | 1997 |
| River Reach Restored by Dam Removal Offers Suitable Spawning Habitat for Endangered Shortnose Sturgeon C Johnston, GB Zydlewski, S Smith, J Zydlewski, MT Kinnison Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 148 (1), 163-175, 2019 | 8 | 2019 |
| Research and scholarship during the COVID-19 pandemic: a wicked problem A Sezen-Barrie, L Carter, S Smith, D Saber, M Wells Innovative Higher Education, 2022 | 6 | 2022 |
| Coordinated river infrastructure decisions improve net social-ecological benefits SG Roy, A Daigneault, J Zydlewski, A Truhlar, S Smith, S Jain, D Hart Environmental Research Letters 15 (10), 104054, 2020 | 6 | 2020 |
| The path to sustainable water resources solutions J Peckenham, D Hart, S Smith, S Jain, W King Maine Policy Review 21 (1), 46-57, 2012 | 6 | 2012 |
