| The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance MM Nelson, CD Schunn Instructional Science 37 (4), 375-401, 2009 | 507 | 2009 |
| A validation study of students' end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor MM Patchan, D Charney, CD Schunn Journal of Writing Research 1 (2), 124-152, 2009 | 95 | 2009 |
| Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: how students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality MM Patchan, CD Schunn Instructional Science 43 (5), 591-614, 2015 | 75 | 2015 |
| Using tablet computers to teach preschool children to write letters: Exploring the impact of extrinsic and intrinsic feedback MM Patchan, CS Puranik Computers & Education 102, 128-137, 2016 | 69 | 2016 |
| The nature of feedback: How peer feedback features affect students’ implementation rate and quality of revisions. MM Patchan, CD Schunn, RJ Correnti Journal of Educational Psychology 108 (8), 1098, 2016 | 59 | 2016 |
| The effects of skill diversity on commenting and revisions MM Patchan, B Hawk, CA Stevens, CD Schunn Instructional Science 41 (2), 381-405, 2013 | 42 | 2013 |
| Accountability in peer assessment: examining the effects of reviewing grades on peer ratings and peer feedback MM Patchan, CD Schunn, RJ Clark Studies in Higher Education 43 (12), 2263-2278, 2018 | 24 | 2018 |
| Writing in natural sciences: Understanding the effects of different types of reviewers on the writing process. MM Patchan, CD Schunn, RJ Clark Journal of Writing Research 2 (3), 2010 | 24 | 2010 |
| Understanding the effects of receiving peer feedback for text revision: Relations between author and reviewer ability. MM Patchan, CD Schunn Journal of Writing Research 8 (2), 2016 | 22 | 2016 |
| The effect of blended instruction on accelerated learning MM Patchan, CD Schunn, W Sieg, D McLaughlin Technology, Pedagogy and Education 25 (3), 269-286, 2016 | 22 | 2016 |
| An evaluation of accelerated learning in the CMU Open Learning Initiative course Logic & Proofs CD Schunn, M Patchan Report, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 2009 | 21 | 2009 |
| Determining adequate information for green building occupant training materials D Steinberg, M Patchan, C Schunn, A Landis Journal of Green Building 4 (3), 143-150, 2009 | 20 | 2009 |
| Developing a focus for green building occupant training materials D Steinberg, M Patchan, C Schunn, A Landis Journal of Green Building 4 (2), 175-184, 2009 | 18 | 2009 |
| Using peer assisted strategies to teach early writing: Results of a pilot study to examine feasibility and promise CS Puranik, MM Patchan, CJ Lemons, S Al Otaiba Reading and Writing 30 (1), 25-50, 2017 | 16 | 2017 |
| Peer review of writing: Learning from revision using peer feedback and reviewing peers' texts MM Patchan University of Pittsburgh, 2011 | 11 | 2011 |
| Facilitating peer tutoring and assessment in intelligent learning systems RD Roscoe, EA Walker, MM Patchan Tutoring and intelligent tutoring systems, 41-68, 2018 | 7 | 2018 |
| Examining alphabet writing fluency in kindergarten: Exploring the issue of time on task CS Puranik, MM Patchan, MM Sears, KL McMaster Assessment for Effective Intervention 42 (2), 81-96, 2017 | 6 | 2017 |
| The nature of feedback: Investigating how different types of feedback affect writing performance MM Nelson, CD Schunn Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 29 (29), 2007 | 6 | 2007 |
| Peer review of writing: Learning from revision using peer feedback and reviewing peers’ texts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) M Patchan Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 2011 | 5 | 2011 |
| Impact of Diverse Abilities on Learning to Write through Peer-Review M Patchan, C Schunn Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 32 (32), 2010 | 4 | 2010 |
Christian SchunnProfessor of Psychology, University of PittsburghVerified email at pitt.edu
