Xenia Schmalz
Citata da
Citata da
Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth
X Schmalz, E Marinus, M Coltheart, A Castles
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22 (6), 1614-1629, 2015
Statistical learning and dyslexia: A systematic review
X Schmalz, G Altoè, C Mulatti
Annals of Dyslexia 67 (2), 147-162, 2017
Phonological decoding or direct access? Regularity effects in lexical decisions of Grade 3 and 4 children
X Schmalz, E Marinus, A Castles
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (2), 338-346, 2013
Is statistical learning ability related to reading ability, and if so, why?
X Schmalz, K Moll, C Mulatti, G Schulte-Körne
Scientific Studies of Reading 23 (1), 64-76, 2019
Unpredictability and complexity of print-to-speech correspondences increase reliance on lexical processes: More evidence for the Orthographic Depth Hypothesis
X Schmalz, E Beyersmann, E Cavalli, E Marinus
Journal of Cognitive Psychology 28 (6), 658-672, 2016
Quantifying the reliance on different sublexical correspondences in German and English
X Schmalz, E Marinus, S Robidoux, S Palethorpe, A Castles, M Coltheart
Journal of Cognitive Psychology 26 (8), 831-852, 2014
German and English bodies: No evidence for cross-linguistic differences in preferred orthographic grain size
X Schmalz, S Robidoux, A Castles, M Coltheart, E Marinus
Collabra: Psychology 3 (1), 2017
Effectiveness of spelling interventions for learners with dyslexia: A meta-analysis and systematic review
K Galuschka, R Görgen, J Kalmar, S Haberstroh, X Schmalz, ...
Educational Psychologist 55 (1), 1-20, 2020
Busting a myth with the Bayes Factor: Effects of letter bigram frequency in visual lexical decision do not reflect reading processes
X Schmalz, C Mulatti
The Mental Lexicon 12 (2), 263-282, 2018
The power is in collaboration: Developing international networks to increase the reproducibility of science
X Schmalz
The Winnower 3 (e146178. 82672), 2016
Two distinct parsing stages in nonword reading aloud: Evidence from Russian
X Schmalz, A Porshnev, E Marinus
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1-34, 2016
Variations in the use of simple and context-sensitive grapheme-phoneme correspondences in English and German developing readers
X Schmalz, S Robidoux, A Castles, E Marinus
Annals of Dyslexia, 1-20, 2020
Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture–Word, and Word–Word Interference Tasks
X Schmalz, B Treccani, C Mulatti
Frontiers in Psychology 6, 2015
Methodological and theoretical issues in cross-linguistic reading research
X Schmalz
Sydney, Australia: Macquarie University, 2015
Do faster learners know more? Orthographic learning and knowledge, sensitivity to graphotactic regularities, spelling accuracy, and reading ability in German primary school …
X Schmalz, H Mehlhase, G Schulte-Körne, K Moll, H Wang
Effects of complexity and unpredictability on the learning of an artificial orthography
X Schmalz, C Mulatti, K Moll, G Schulte-Körne
Preprint, 0
What is a Bayes Factor?
X Schmalz, JB Manresa, L Zhang
OSF Preprints, 2020
Order among chaos: cross-linguistic differences and developmental trajectories in pseudoword reading aloud using pronunciation entropy
E De Simone, E Beyersmann, C Mulatti, J Mirault, X Schmalz
OSF Preprints, 2020
How does sentence context affect word frequency effects? A within-task investigation
X Schmalz, RM Maier, C Mulatti
OSF Preprints, 2020
We still need more trust in science: the need for broader adoption of Registered Reports
TB Roettger, X Schmalz, C Chambers, H Fraser, D Mellor, L Ostojic, ...
MetaArXiv, 2019
Il sistema al momento non può eseguire l'operazione. Riprova più tardi.
Articoli 1–20