| The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior TR Tyler, SL Blader Personality and social psychology review 7 (4), 349-361, 2003 | 3020 | 2003 |
| Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement T Tyler, S Blader Routledge, 2013 | 2634 | 2013 |
| Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement T Tyler, S Blader Routledge, 2013 | 2634 | 2013 |
| Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. SL Blader, TR Tyler Journal of applied psychology 94 (2), 445, 2009 | 1227 | 2009 |
| A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a “fair” process SL Blader, TR Tyler Personality and social psychology bulletin 29 (6), 747-758, 2003 | 848 | 2003 |
| Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings TR Tyler, SL Blader Academy of management journal 48 (6), 1143-1158, 2005 | 670 | 2005 |
| Identity and cooperative behavior in groups TR Tyler, SL Blader Group processes & intergroup relations 4 (3), 207-226, 2001 | 647 | 2001 |
| Differentiating the effects of status and power: a justice perspective. SL Blader, YR Chen Journal of personality and social psychology 102 (5), 994, 2012 | 536 | 2012 |
| What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice SL Blader, TR Tyler Human Resource Management Review 13 (1), 107-126, 2003 | 400 | 2003 |
| Autonomous vs. comparative status: Must we be better than others to feel good about ourselves? TR Tyler, SL Blader Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89 (1), 813-838, 2002 | 375 | 2002 |
| Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures D De Cremer, SL Blader European Journal of Social Psychology 36 (2), 211-228, 2006 | 218 | 2006 |
| 11 How Can Theories of Organizational justice Explain the Effects of Fairness? SL Blader, TR Tyler Handbook of organizational justice, 329-354, 2013 | 214 | 2013 |
| Looking out from the top: Differential effects of status and power on perspective taking SL Blader, A Shirako, YR Chen Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 42 (6), 723-737, 2016 | 196 | 2016 |
| What influences how higher-status people respond to lower-status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status SL Blader, YR Chen Organization Science 22 (4), 1040-1060, 2011 | 150 | 2011 |
| Implicit impressions JS Uleman, SL Blader, A Todorov The new unconscious, 362-392, 2005 | 148 | 2005 |
| What’s in a name? Status, power, and other forms of social hierarchy SL Blader, YR Chen The psychology of social status, 71-95, 2014 | 140 | 2014 |
| Organizational identification and workplace behavior: More than meets the eye SL Blader, S Patil, DJ Packer Research in organizational behavior 37, 19-34, 2017 | 128 | 2017 |
| What determines people’s fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural justice evaluations under uncertainty SL Blader Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (6), 986-994, 2007 | 125 | 2007 |
| The contingent effect of management practices S Blader, C Gartenberg, A Prat The Review of Economic Studies 87 (2), 721-749, 2020 | 122 | 2020 |
| Assuming preferential selection when the admissions policy is unknown: The effects of gender rarity. ME Heilman, SL Blader Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (2), 188, 2001 | 112 | 2001 |
