Follow
Theresa Redl
Theresa Redl
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics & Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University
Verified email at mpi.nl - Homepage
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Processing prescriptively incorrect comparative particles: Evidence from sentence-matching and eye-tracking
F Hubers, T Redl, H De Vos, L Reinarz, H De Hoop
Frontiers in psychology 11, 498796, 2020
202020
The processing of the Dutch masculine generic zijn ‘his’ across stereotype contexts: An eye-tracking study
T Redl, A Eerland, TJM Sanders
PloS one 13 (10), e0205903, 2018
162018
The male bias of a generically-intended masculine pronoun: Evidence from eye-tracking and sentence evaluation
T Redl, SL Frank, P De Swart, H De Hoop
PloS one 16 (4), e0249309, 2021
15*2021
Gender-mismatching pronouns in context: The interpretation of possessive pronouns in Dutch and Limburgian
J Piepers, T Redl
Linguistics in the Netherlands 35 (1), 97-110, 2018
62018
Masculine generic pronouns: Investigating the processing of an unintended gender cue
T Redl
Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen, 2021
42021
Are second person masculine generics easier to process for men than for women? Evidence from polish
A Szuba, T Redl, H De Hoop
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 51 (4), 819-845, 2022
32022
Masculine generic pronouns as a gender cue in generic statements
T Redl, A Szuba, P de Swart, SL Frank, H de Hoop
Discourse Processes 59 (10), 828-845, 2022
22022
Processing mismatching gendered possessive pronouns in L1 Dutch and L2 French
GT Schoenmakers, T Redl, S Collin, R Versendaal, PJF de Swart, H Hoop
22022
The male bias of a generically-intended personal pronoun in language processing
T Redl, SL Frank, P de Swart, H de Hoop
PsyArXiv, 2020
22020
A psycholinguistic view on stereotypical and grammatical gender: The effects and remedies
J Misersky, T Redl
Diversiteit. Een multidisciplinaire terreinverkenning, 237-255, 2020
22020
Voorbeeldzinnen kunnen het goede voorbeeld geven
C Van Herpt, M Van der Meulen, T Redl
Levende Talen Magazine 106 (4), 18-21, 2019
22019
On the acceptability of the not so dummy auxiliary ‘do’in Dutch
C Sert, F Hubers, T Redl, H Hoop
Linguistics in the Netherlands 40 (1), 210-229, 2023
12023
To each their own: Investigating the Dutch masculine generic zijn ‘his’ across stereotype contexts
T Redl
12016
The not so dummy auxiliary'do'in Dutch
FCW Hubers, T Redl, H Hoop
Radboud Data Repository, 2023
2023
Strange nominative case in topicalized object pronominal relative clauses
M Suijkerbuijk, T Redl, H de Hoop
Linguistics in the Netherlands 38 (1), 81-97, 2021
2021
Neurologe of liever neuroloog? Het effect van vrouwelijke functiebenamingen op de geloofwaardigheid van medisch specialisten
E de Cocq, T Redl
Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 43 (1), 35-63, 2021
2021
Do masculine generic pronouns favor male referents? Evidence from eye-tracking
T Redl, P De Swart, S Frank, H De Hoop
Discourse Expectations: Theoretical, Experimental, and Computational …, 2019
2019
Does grammatical gender matter in addressing? Exploring the effect of gender marking on processing of second-person singular Polish verbs
A Szuba, T Redl, H De Hoop
the 5th Workshop of the International Network of Address Research (INAR5), 2019
2019
Do masculine generic pronouns cause a male bias in online processing? Evidence from eye-tracking
T Redl, P De Swart, S Frank, H De Hoop
Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 2019), 2019
2019
Gender-mismatching pronouns in context: The interpretation of Dutch zijn'his' and Limburgian zien'his/its'
J Piepers, T Redl
the workshop" Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Gender"(ThEGen), 2018
2018
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20