|One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis|
A Tagliafico, D Astengo, F Cavagnetto, R Rosasco, G Rescinito, F Monetti, ...
European radiology 22 (3), 539-544, 2012
|Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software|
A Tagliafico, G Tagliafico, D Astengo, F Cavagnetto, R Rosasco, ...
European radiology 22 (6), 1265-1270, 2012
|‘In vivo’ average glandular dose evaluation: one-to-one comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography|
F Cavagnetto, G Taccini, R Rosasco, R Bampi, M Calabrese, A Tagliafico
Radiation protection dosimetry 157 (1), 53-61, 2013
|A quality-driven ensemble approach to automatic model selection in clustering|
R Rosasco, H Mahmoud, S Rovetta, F Masulli
Recent Advances of Neural Network Models and Applications, 53-61, 2014
|Monte Carlo (MC) code application to mammography: Evaluation of the coefficients for the estimation of the average glandular dose (AGD)|
F Badino, F Bisi, R Rosasco, N Canevarollo
Physica Medica 1 (32), 73, 2016
|Analysis on phantom images between 2D synthesized mammography (SM) from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and flat field mammography (FFDM)|
R Rosasco, F Bisi, N Canevarollo
Physica Medica 1 (32), 90, 2016
|A proposal of mammography QC-related indicator for HTA evaluation|
M Piergentili, F Bisi, F Cavagnetto, N Canevarollo, D Rembado, A Rivolta, ...
Physica Medica 1 (32), 86-87, 2016
|Average glandular dose (AGD) in mammography: Reliability of recorded data in order to comply to Council Directive 59/2013/Euratom|
F Bisi, N Canevarollo, F Cavagnetto, F Foppiano, M Piergentili, ...
Physica Medica 1 (32), 117, 2016